|
1 Some staff may work more efficiently or experience less conflict between
work and their other responsibilities if they can undertake part of their
work away from their office location.
2 Assignments requiring long periods of concentration, such as data
analysis or writing, may be easier to tackle where there is less distraction
and interruption than at the office. In addition, reducing commuting
time may increase the amount of time and energy staff can devote to work.
3 Flexi-place policies that allow for alternative work locations permit
staff to schedule either occasional or regular work times outside the
office. New information and communication technologies make it possible
to access datasets, information sources and people without being at the
office. Examples include e-mail, Internet, computers with remote access,
video-conferencing and voice mail.
4 Unless there are overwhelming reasons to the contrary (e.g. service
delivery needs), all employees should have access to flexi-place, i.e.
working from home or another alternative location. Requests for approval
for working from an alternative location should be dealt with primarily
on the basis of feasibility. Nevertheless, there should be clear justification
for all requests.
5 To be successful, flexi-place
arrangements require the staff member and her/his manager to be clear
from the beginning about expectations. It is also necessary for the staff
member to ensure that all responsibilities will be covered.
Alert:
Facts about staff members who work from home
… and their productivity
Will a person working at home be less productive
because she/he has more distractions than at the office?
“Though interruptions
from family are commonly assumed to be a problem for at-home workers, off-site
workers actually experience fewer work interruptions than on-site workers, who
are frequently interrupted by on-site colleagues.”
(from “When the Workplace is Many Places: The Extent and Nature
of Off-Site Work Today”, by Amy Richman, Karen Noble and Arlene
Johnson; WFD Consulting)
6 Flexi-place can be implemented
in a variety of scenarios:
- small-scale flexi-place – might involve
occasional short periods (a few days or even a few weeks) of working
from home or another alternative location (e.g. to write up material
for a specific report or scientific paper);
- medium-scale flexi-place – might
involve regularly scheduled work times outside the office (e.g. one
or two days per week); and
- large-scale flexi-place – might involve
lengthy periods (a few months or even a year) working from a different
country to accommodate special personal situations, such as to permit
the staff member:
- an extended visit with a spouse who does not live
at a Center location, or
- to live with a child requiring lengthy medical
treatment in a different country.
7 Another example of a
large-scale flexi-place arrangement involves allowing a staff member
to hold a regular position in a location that does not have a CGIAR office.
This has already been established across some CGIAR Centers with great
success. These arrangements, agreed to be in the mutual interest of the
Center and the staff member, typically specify the number (and duration)
of visits to the staff member’s
nominal “home base” duty station each year. While these arrangements
are fairly exceptional, they have been critical to the Center’s
ability to attract and retain valuable staff.
Developing a policy framework for implementing FLEXI-PLACE
8 The development of a flexi-place (alternative work location) policy
would normally be guided by the following basic principles.
Access to flexi-place
9 Unless there are overwhelming reasons to the contrary (e.g. service
delivery needs), the policy should provide all employees with access
to flexi-place. Requests for approval for working from home or other
alternative locations should be dealt with on the basis of feasibility.
Nevertheless, there should be clear justification for all requests.
Options for working from home/alternative location
10 Several options exist for working from
home/alternative location. These typically will be defined with the following
dimensions:
- the length of time each day to be spent out of the
office: this should be an agreed part of every day (which may include
the whole day);
- the period for which these arrangements are approved:
this can range from a few days to a number of weeks or even be approved
on an on-going basis;
- the period/frequency for which the staff member
is required to visit her/his official duty station: this can be the
number of hours per day or days per week or month, to attend specific
meetings, etc.; and
- responsibilities for communication while at the
alternate workplace, such as being reachable via phone or e-mail.
Typical circumstances justifying working from home/alternative location
11 Working from home/alternative location
may be considered in circumstances such as when:
- the nature of the staff
member’s current task requires considerable
concentration in an environment that will allow uninterrupted work;
- a
staff member needs to accommodate a short-term personal/family need;
- a staff member needs to accommodate a long-term personal/family need;
- a staff member is physically unable to get to work;
- a staff member
is undertaking a return-to-work program following medical treatment;
or
- a staff member’s absence from her/his normal workplace (except
in the case of accident/injury or return-to-work program) will not
unduly affect productivity.
Circumstances when working from home/alternative location should not
be considered
12 Working from home/alternative location must not be approved if medical
opinion determines that the person is unfit for work.
Consideration of requests
13 There should be mutually agreed objectives for the work to be undertaken
at the alternative location and clear criteria for assessing the success
or outcomes of the arrangements.
14 The following factors
need to be taken into account when considering requests for working from
home/alternative location:
- suitability of the task or activity for working
from home/alternative location;
- potential to set clear tasks/deliverables
for the activities to be undertaken from home/alternative location;
- extent to which the staff
member’s working from home/alternative
location may impact the performance of a team or of work with partner
organizations, etc.;
- adequacy of communication and interaction when
the staff member is working at home/alternative location; and
- assurance of security and
confidentiality of information stored or accessed at the home/alternative
location.
15 When considering requests for flexi-place arrangements, it may be
necessary to weigh the costs and benefits of approving the requested
arrangements. Many flexi-place arrangements have short-term costs that
typically are modest but deliver significant long-term benefits.
Other issues
16 Home/alternative location working environments used on an ongoing
basis must comply with all workplace health and safety requirements.
In addition, it is necessary to ensure that appropriate insurance coverage
is in place and that all necessary permissions have been obtained for
the location (e.g. from a landlord or mortgage lender).
Operating arrangements
17 The extent of approvals required for staff requesting to work from
home/alternative location depends both on feasibility and on the reasons
for the request.
18 In the initial implementation, controls regarding approval and oversight
may be fairly closely defined. With experience, some of these controls
may be relaxed in certain circumstances. For example, occasionally working
from home for up to a day may require only informal approval from the
supervisor.
19 As with other flexible
workplace practices, managers should base appraisal of the staff members
working from home/alternative location on their output rather than their
working patterns.
Putting these principles into practice
22 A model set of administrative arrangements for flexi-place is provided
in Tips and Tools. Note that these arrangements are intended only to
be a model, rather than a comprehensive plan. We recommend that they
not be adopted until the Center has checked every paragraph in detail
for acceptability and feasibility. There may be important local considerations
not reflected in this model that should be incorporated into the final
arrangements.
 
|