|
This introductory section deals with the following issues:
- overview
- fundamentally re-thinking the traditional approach to spouses/partners
- accommodating all categories of spouses/partners: expatriate, distant
and local
- recognizing the strategic significance of good practices for accommodating
spouses/partners
- the challenges faced by spouses/partners
- issues for expatriate, distant and local spouses/partners
- accommodating the diversity of spouses/partners: male/female, same-sex,
cultures with multiple wives, defining a partner
- what these guidelines provide (including sections on model policy,
sample practices, and tips and tools for implementation.)
The Gender and Diversity Program (G&D) recognizes
that existing practices for accommodating the spouses or partners of
staff often do not cover the scope of issues that need to be dealt
with in today's Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research
(CGIAR). Thus, we have developed these guidelines to assist CGIAR Centers
in refining their existing practices and in exploring innovative ways
of adapting to the global trend of dual career couples.
These guidelines include a model policy ready to be adapted or adopted
by the Centers as well as related sample practices, and tips and tools.
All are linked to make it easy for you to tap into our best recommendations
for accommodating spouses/partners.
Many Centers have shared their best practices
to help G&D develop
these guidelines, and some external organizations have served as models
of good practice. This Inclusive Workplace e-Resource Center is designed
to serve as a platform for ongoing exchange and improvement.
OVERVIEW
1 Adopting good practice for accommodating spouses/partners is a strategic
issue for CGIAR Centers because of its influence – both positive
and negative – on the staff member. A staff member’s spouse/partner
being overwhelmed by life far from home can have a major impact on
the Center, particularly if this leads to the premature departure of
the staff member.
2 Consequently, the ability to accommodate spouses/partners effectively
should be seen as a core competency for CGIAR Centers. This is a competency
to be developed, sustained and enhanced just as a Center sustains its
other core competencies in research, technology, cross-cultural operations
and the like.

Alert!
If a Center cannot accommodate spouses/partners,
it effectively restricts itself to staff members who are unattached or
whose spouses/partners need no assistance in pursuing their careers or
education.
FUNDAMENTALLY RE-THINKING THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH
TO SPOUSES/PARTNERS
3 In developing this section of the Inclusive
Workplace e-Resource Center, we gathered information about good practice
within and outside the CGIAR and looked at some of the problems experienced
by spouses/partners. Our knowledge was extended significantly when we
sought comments from some Centers on our draft. However, we then found
ourselves in a situation where:
- we were excited by some of the initiatives
already implemented in some Centers, and some of the ideas they are
currently developing, but
- we also could see a clear need for fundamentally
rethinking some traditional approaches to accommodating spouses/partners.
4 Therefore, in this section
we recommend initiatives that involve a whole new approach to spouses/partners,
such as:
- expanding from the traditional focus on expatriate
spouses/partners to accommodate all spouses/partners;
- abandoning the
expectation that job candidates will accept job offers before all spouse/partner
issues are fully resolved;
- developing comprehensive approaches to overcome
the problem of “trailing
spouses” – spouses/partners who have had to put on-hold
their own professional careers, maintenance of professional skills,
and professional development and networking;
- treating partnered appointees
and their spouses/partners as a couple and developing mechanisms for
couple appointments where necessary, rather than dealing with the two
people separately;
- re-thinking traditional approaches to working relationships
that exclude family members from being in a supervisory relationship
to each other;
- improving host-country agreements to accommodate rather
than obstruct the employment of spouses/partners;
- ensuring that HR is
both resourced and accountable for accommodating spouses/partners;
- developing
spouse/partner committees as a major resource contributing to Center
effectiveness;
- adopting a comprehensive structure for information provided
to new appointees and their spouses/partners, ensuring it addresses
family issues, occupation issues, community issues and recreation at
their duty stations.
5 To achieve this will require substantial effort. However, these initiatives
reflect not only the strategic and operational needs in this area, they
also reflect some of the innovative success stories already emerging
from Centers.
ACCOMMODATING ALL CATEGORIES OF SPOUSES/PARTNERS
Categories
of Spouses/Partners

6 In this section of the
Inclusive Workplace e-Resource Center, we define three categories of
spouses/partners based on the distance between their duty stations and
the countries/towns from which they come:
- expatriate spouses/partners – come
to the duty station from another country;
- distant spouses/partners – come
from within the country where the duty station is located, but their
original locale was a considerable distance from the duty station,
and
- local spouses/partners – were living at or near the duty station
before their spouse/partner commenced work at the Center.
7 Many of the established practices across CGIAR Centers focus on expatriate
spouses/partners of internationally recruited staff, particularly in
facilitating employment opportunities. However, in this section of the
Inclusive Workplace e-Resource Center, we have tried to ensure that the
diverse needs of all spouses/partners are recognized and accommodated
by Centers. This is particularly significant as some locally recruited
appointees and their spouses/partners may have relocated to the duty
station from a considerable distance within their home country.
8 A common approach often can accommodate challenges
that affect all three categories spouse/partner categories – expatriate,
distant and local. However, for other challenges, the solution needs
to be tailored to the individual circumstances of the spouse/partner
category.
Families living apart
9 We also recognize that, despite a Center’s best efforts to accommodate
spouses/partners, there will be circumstances where it simply will not
be feasible for families to live together at the staff member’s
duty station. Typically, this is because of the spouse/partner’s
career commitments and/or caring responsibilities for family members.
This is a growing problem for Centers – how can they best accommodate
these situations? Consequently we have included a Sample Practice on “Families
Living Apart” with suggestions for meeting these needs.
Recognizing the strategic significance of good practices for accommodating
spouseS/partners
10 It is easy to overlook the critical influence spouses/partners have
on an organization – particularly an international organization
operating principally in the developing world. Many staff and their spouses
may be from overseas or from a considerable distance away from their
duty station. Irrespective of their origin, many are located at duty
stations where they face a whole range of challenges – access to
health services, family services, education, employment and supplies
of food or household goods – that are taken for granted in developed
countries.
“Being a father to my children and a husband to a wife whose career
is equal in importance to mine is not included in my Center’s appreciation
of what makes me an effective, healthy and hopefully creative employee.”
Comment from a male scientist, G&D
Working Paper No. 37.

Unhappiness matters
Research shows that the principal
reason for failure of an expatriate appointment is an unhappy spouse/partner.
There is a high incidence of marital break-ups among
expatriate couples throughout the CGIAR.
11 Every loss of a staff member represents a
significant cost to the Center, particularly in terms of lost productivity
while her/his successor is recruited and trained. It doesn’t
matter whether the staff member is a scientist or a technician, recruiting
takes time and a considerable familiarization or training period is
needed for staff members to become fully effective in their new positions.
Meanwhile the Center has commitments to donors and partners and the
deadlines for meeting those commitments do not allow for impaired productivity
due to the loss and replacement of staff.

Happiness matters
Recognize the importance of
spouse/partner “happiness” in
a new environment. Centers need to treat spouses/partners as critical
to the Center’s performance.
THE CHALLENGES FACED BY SPOUSES/PARTNERS
12 New staff members and their spouses/partners come to a Center with
four types of needs: occupation, family, community and recreation (see
model). Occupation needs are immediately taken care of for staff members
because they have access to workplace networks and their supervisors
and other colleagues from whom to seek advice. But the situation is
very different for their spouses/partners.

13 As the model shows, a spouse/partner confronts four separate sets
of needs. This has significant implications for the support systems and
processes that Centers need to devise to assist the spouse/partner in
becoming established in the new environment. Options for meeting these
needs are presented in the Sample Practices and Tips
and Tools sections.
14 There is a broad sequential
order that can be followed in order to address all four aspects of the
issues facing the spouse/partner:
- provide the spouse/partner the opportunity
to visit the prospective duty station during the candidate interview
process;
- provide
assistance with settling in to the new station;
- provide opportunities
for networking and professional development;
- facilitate the employment
process.
ISSUES FOR EXPATRIATE, DISTANT AND LOCAL SPOUSES/PARTNERS
Expatriate
spouses/partners
15 Expatriate appointees are most likely to have expatriate spouses/partners,
with neither holding citizenship of the country where the duty station
is located. However, the term “expatriate” spouse/partner
also includes those who are citizens of that country, but
who were not resident at the time of their partner’s appointment. That
is, they have come to the duty station from another country, perhaps
after a lengthy absence from their home country, and consequently do
not possess detailed, up-to-date knowledge of life, family services,
education facilities and employment opportunities at the duty station.
16 The successful accommodation of expatriate
spouse/partner needs is an important, but often overlooked, factor
in the success of expatriate appointments. It needs to be seen as a
strategic issue. Centers consequently need to look at expatriate recruitment
in the context of the appointee’s
entire family and do everything they can to prevent the creation of trailing
spouses.
17 CGIAR Centers remain
critically dependent on expatriate appointments in their key leadership
and science positions, almost all of which are filled by international
competition. Expatriate appointments fall into the “high risk” category
for Centers because of the costs, the risk of failure and the consequences
of failure. For example:
- the positions filled by expatriates have significant
leadership roles and, consequently, the quality of their performance
affects not only their personal technical achievement but also the
potential achievement of their staff and relationships with partners
and donors;
- expatriates’ effectiveness is dependent on their
ability (and their families’ ability) to adjust to their new
duty station;
- these appointees are relatively costly in terms of salaries
and benefits,
- if the appointment is a failure, and if the appointee
leaves the Center within, say, a year of commencement, it represents
a very significant financial and operational loss; and
- there will be
a long lead time in recruiting a successor.
18 Therefore, Centers need to take all possible steps to make these
appointments successful. This requires the establishment of comprehensive
and timely practices, and the ability both to comprehend and empathize
with the problems faced by expatriates.
How effective are existing policies in practice?
19 While several Centers have some form of policy supporting expatriate
spouses/partners, they may not seem effective to the people they are
meant to accommodate.

Pay attention to spouse/partner perceptions
Spouses/partners located at two Centers attended a meeting where they
voiced their feelings that:
• they have the perception that they (spouses/partners) must be totally
self reliant and
• they have the perception that they must ask the Centers for everything
they need
• and, thus, Centers need to support spouses/partners in a way that changes
these perceptions.
Both of these Centers are in urban areas and have HR
units. This raises the question that if spouses/partners are not being
supported in these Centers, how well are they being supported in regional
and country duty stations?

Spouses/partners impact expatriate recruitment
A
2003 HR survey of international organizations found:
• 74% of expatriates were married
• 81% of marriages are now dual-career.
Assuming that data for CGIAR Centers
would be comparable, attempts to recruit expatriates without planning for
their spouse/partners will face obvious obstacles and will affect a Center’s
ability to recruit and also to retain expatriate staff.
Distant spouses/partners
20 Distant spouses/partners often face the same challenges as expatriate
spouses/partners. Although they have been recruited from within the
same country as the duty station, they may have relocated several hundred
and possibly more than a thousand kilometers from their former homes.
21 These spouses/partners also have left behind their support networks
of relatives, professional colleagues and friends. They often have little
or no knowledge of accommodations, schooling, medical and other family
services at the duty station.
22 Distant spouses/partners usually are citizens of the country in which
the duty station is located. Although they do not face the same barriers
to employment as foreigners, they still may be unfamiliar with employment
opportunities in the vicinity of the duty station.
23 Therefore, there are persuasive reasons for ensuring distant spouses/partners
are not overlooked when developing policies and practices for accommodating
spouses/partners.
Local Spouses/partners
24 Local spouses/partners do not face the obstacles to employment encountered
by expatriate spouses/partners and, unlike distant spouses/partners,
do not leave their support networks behind. However, they face various
challenges in their home locations, especially if there is high unemployment
or under-employment of skilled people. These are instances where Centers
can offer support and thus enhance the overall sense of community.
ACCOMMODATING THE DIVERSITY OF SPOUSES/PARTNERS
Male
and female spouses/partners
25 It is important at the outset to recognize the need to accommodate
both male and female spouses/partners. Thus far, men make up the majority
of CGIAR international appointments and their spouses/partners are
women, many of whom are also professionals. However, in a number of
cases, the appointees taking up an overseas appointment are women accompanied
by their male spouses/partners.
26 Perhaps more significantly, CGIAR Centers recognize the need to increase
the number of women in senior management significantly. However, women
with the competencies and record of achievement required for appointments
at this level are highly likely to have spouses/partners who are also
senior professionals. If a Center lacks the ability to accommodate spouses/partners,
this has a parallel implication for its potential to appoint women to
senior management roles.
Same-sex spouses and partners
27 Same-sex partnerships are not uncommon, and some countries have legalized
same-sex marriages. As a general principle, the practices recommended
in this section apply equally to opposite-sex and same-sex partners.
28 However, same-sex relationships may be illegal in some countries
where CGIAR Centers conduct their operations. This restricts the applicability
of some of the options proposed in this section and requires that job
candidates with same-sex spouses/partners receive special advice from
the Center during the recruitment phase.
Cultures with multiple wives
29 Polygamy is practiced in several countries where CGIAR Centers conduct
their operations. The various suggestions and recommended practices
in this section may need to be adjusted to accommodate multiple wives.
Defining partners
30 Defining “partner”, not only for the purpose of this section
of the Inclusive Workplace e-Resource Center but also for eligibility
for certain benefits, is complex. We have provided some guidance and
examples of different Centers’ practices in the Sample Practices
section, “Defining a Partner”, and in the Tips and Tools
section, “Domestic Partner
Agreements”.
WHAT DO THESE GUIDELINES PROVIDE?
Model policy
31 The Model Policy suggests a broad policy statement together with a
list of supporting practices that can be included in the Center’s
Personnel Policy Manual (PPM). These practices are options – the
list is neither the minimum acceptable nor the maximum possible. Centers
should list practices that can be applied effectively, either as a
Center-wide ongoing policy or as a trial, either across the entire
Center or in specific geographic locations. Centers also can identify
other practices that can enhance their ability to accommodate spouses
and partners.
Sample Practices
32 The sample practices provided in this
section include:
Tips and Tools
33 The tips and tools provided in this section
include:
Acknowledgements
To help us develop these guidelines
several CGIAR Centers shared with us their existing policies and practices
for accommodating spouses/partners. They also provided valuable comments
on earlier drafts which helped us refine the material presented in this
section of the Inclusive Workplace e-Resource Center. We particularly
thank:
- CIFOR, whose overall spouse/partner policy framework
provided a model for much of this section;
- CIP, which suggested extensive
additions that have been incorporated in the pre-appointment initiatives
sample practice;
- IFPRI, for material dealing with the formal status
of partners;
- IITA, for information about its Community Resources Center;
and
- IRRI, for information about its Family Services Center.
Pertinent input also came from G&D Working Paper No. 37 “Female
and Male CGIAR Scientists in Comparative Perspective” (Rathgeber,
2002). We also drew on research concerning expatriate couples from the
HR consulting firm, ORC Worldwide (2003).
Nancy Allen and Fabiola Amariles made significant contributions during
the consultation phase following the initial draft.
This project could never have been realized without
G&D’s
creative teamwork, bringing together the talents of Bob Moore and Antonia
Okono along with myself for content, and Nancy Hart, Joanne Morgante
and Roberto Magini for editing, design and programming. I sincerely thank
each for their artistry and sincere dedication to inclusion.
Vicki Wilde
Leader
CGIAR Gender & Diversity Program
 
|